<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Gates Doing the Promo Circuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/bill-gates-doing-the-promo-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/bill-gates-doing-the-promo-circuit/</link>
	<description>ain&#039;t we fancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Jensen</title>
		<link>http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/bill-gates-doing-the-promo-circuit/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://high.bigwidesky.com/?p=66#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I recently had a conversation wherein I suggested that Steve Jobs is &quot;charismatic&quot;. Since this remark was in the context of a Windows vs. Mac spar, I presumed my pal would understand that I meant &quot;only compared to Bill Gates.&quot; He didn&#039;t.
Pal, it doesn&#039;t matter that Steve Jobs isn&#039;t charismatic compared to TV heartthrob Chuck Woolery.*
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill, we love you too.**
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** Send money.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently had a conversation wherein I suggested that Steve Jobs is &#8220;charismatic&#8221;. Since this remark was in the context of a Windows vs. Mac spar, I presumed my pal would understand that I meant &#8220;only compared to Bill Gates.&#8221; He didn&#8217;t.<br />
Pal, it doesn&#8217;t matter that Steve Jobs isn&#8217;t charismatic compared to TV heartthrob Chuck Woolery.*</p>
<p>
* Bill, we love you too.**</p>
<p>
** Send money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Behr</title>
		<link>http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/bill-gates-doing-the-promo-circuit/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Behr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 04:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://high.bigwidesky.com/?p=66#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Brad - good pointns.  It will be interesting to see if these two companies can still thrive when the founding CEO&#039;s leave.  When Dave Farrell from May Company left, the company was acquired/merged with its largest competitor about 7 years later (see Tale of Two Companies post).   Read Build to Last - same author as Good to Great (I think).  Lots of great examplse of companies that have been successful for over 50 years - so through several CEO&#039;s.   Also - keep an eye on Dell and Nike.  Michael Dell handed over the CEO job 3 years ago and just had to take it back.  Phil Knight tried to leave twice, and had to jump back both times.
If Jobs can institutionalize the innovation and incredible design into the culture, and select a successor, they may do well.  We&#039;ll see.  Gates just recently stepped out of a day to day role - we&#039;ll see there too.
Thanks for you thoughts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad &#8211; good pointns.  It will be interesting to see if these two companies can still thrive when the founding CEO&#8217;s leave.  When Dave Farrell from May Company left, the company was acquired/merged with its largest competitor about 7 years later (see Tale of Two Companies post).   Read Build to Last &#8211; same author as Good to Great (I think).  Lots of great examplse of companies that have been successful for over 50 years &#8211; so through several CEO&#8217;s.   Also &#8211; keep an eye on Dell and Nike.  Michael Dell handed over the CEO job 3 years ago and just had to take it back.  Phil Knight tried to leave twice, and had to jump back both times.<br />
If Jobs can institutionalize the innovation and incredible design into the culture, and select a successor, they may do well.  We&#8217;ll see.  Gates just recently stepped out of a day to day role &#8211; we&#8217;ll see there too.<br />
Thanks for you thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/bill-gates-doing-the-promo-circuit/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://high.bigwidesky.com/?p=66#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve long believed that &quot;cool doesn&#039;t advertise.&quot; Apple &quot;advertises&quot; but not in the desperate, searching-for-a-point fashion that Microsoft does. Apple stayed afloat, and then became wildly successful, largely through great creative advertising. Microsoft seems to succeed in spite of it.
That book from a few years ago, Good to Great, makes an interesting argument about what actually makes a company truly awesome. Some of its good, some of its just typical business-speak, but I thought the point about the importance of a successor interesting. That is, who the current CEO chooses as the next leader. The author gives several examples of powerful leaders who took their company to great heights during their tenure, only for it to stall or stumble following his departure (Chrysler was one example with Iacocca). Apple clearly depends on the presence of Steve Jobs to do well; is the same true for Microsoft? To an extent, sure. Gates has long been a visible figure, but I&#039;m not sure what sort of advantage this will give to Microsoft in the long run. Once he&#039;s totally distanced from the company, what then?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long believed that &#8220;cool doesn&#8217;t advertise.&#8221; Apple &#8220;advertises&#8221; but not in the desperate, searching-for-a-point fashion that Microsoft does. Apple stayed afloat, and then became wildly successful, largely through great creative advertising. Microsoft seems to succeed in spite of it.<br />
That book from a few years ago, Good to Great, makes an interesting argument about what actually makes a company truly awesome. Some of its good, some of its just typical business-speak, but I thought the point about the importance of a successor interesting. That is, who the current CEO chooses as the next leader. The author gives several examples of powerful leaders who took their company to great heights during their tenure, only for it to stall or stumble following his departure (Chrysler was one example with Iacocca). Apple clearly depends on the presence of Steve Jobs to do well; is the same true for Microsoft? To an extent, sure. Gates has long been a visible figure, but I&#8217;m not sure what sort of advantage this will give to Microsoft in the long run. Once he&#8217;s totally distanced from the company, what then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/bill-gates-doing-the-promo-circuit/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 03:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://high.bigwidesky.com/?p=66#comment-88</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s Bill Gates. He&#039;s bigger than Bruce Willis.
He&#039;s the tech geek turned CEO turned megagazillionaire turned superstar. Unlike Miss Hilton, his fame comes from actual accomplishment, how rare.
Mr. Gates understands the weight his &quot;brand&quot; carries and knows what to do maximize media attention. But he&#039;ll never know how to be &quot;cool&quot; or even &quot;comfortable&quot; outside the server room. We wouldn&#039;t like him nearly as much if he was Rico Suave anyway.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s Bill Gates. He&#8217;s bigger than Bruce Willis.<br />
He&#8217;s the tech geek turned CEO turned megagazillionaire turned superstar. Unlike Miss Hilton, his fame comes from actual accomplishment, how rare.<br />
Mr. Gates understands the weight his &#8220;brand&#8221; carries and knows what to do maximize media attention. But he&#8217;ll never know how to be &#8220;cool&#8221; or even &#8220;comfortable&#8221; outside the server room. We wouldn&#8217;t like him nearly as much if he was Rico Suave anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

