<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Been Bloggin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/obama-been-bloggin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/obama-been-bloggin/</link>
	<description>ain&#039;t we fancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliot</title>
		<link>http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/obama-been-bloggin/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://high.bigwidesky.com/?p=72#comment-104</guid>
		<description>One thing is abundantly clear. While they are trying, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joinrudy2008.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;not&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hillaryclinton.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mittromney.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;of&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://johnedwards.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;his&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnmccain.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;challengers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.draftnewt.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;potential&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brownback.com/s/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;or&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://kucinich.us/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;otherwise&lt;/a&gt;, have it together nearly as well as Obama. The two that are closest to getting it, are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hillary.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hillary&lt;/a&gt;, and oddly enough &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joebiden.com/home&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joe Biden&lt;/a&gt;. I wonder whom is(are) the architect(s) of Obama&#039;s online strategy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing is abundantly clear. While they are trying, <a href="http://www.joinrudy2008.com/" rel="nofollow">not</a> <a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/" rel="nofollow">one</a> <a href="http://www.mittromney.com/" rel="nofollow">of</a> <a href="http://johnedwards.com/" rel="nofollow">his</a> <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/" rel="nofollow">challengers</a>, <a href="http://www.draftnewt.org/" rel="nofollow">potential</a> <a href="http://www.brownback.com/s/" rel="nofollow">or</a> <a href="http://kucinich.us/" rel="nofollow">otherwise</a>, have it together nearly as well as Obama. The two that are closest to getting it, are <a href="http://www.hillary.com" rel="nofollow">Hillary</a>, and oddly enough <a href="http://www.joebiden.com/home" rel="nofollow">Joe Biden</a>. I wonder whom is(are) the architect(s) of Obama&#8217;s online strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Jensen</title>
		<link>http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/obama-been-bloggin/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://high.bigwidesky.com/?p=72#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Mark, others will nab this structure for sure.
There is room for improvement, too: though access to the site&#039;s MyBarak functionality required me to register, I&#039;ve yet to receive a(n expected) &quot;welcome and thank you&quot; form email from the man himself. Likewise, though I&#039;ve signed up for a few local groups, I&#039;ve not gotten a &quot;thanks for joining -- how would you like to help?&quot; email from the group leader (this could feasibly be personalized, I reckon, considering most groups appear under 30 folks).
The community-building machine should leap upon these opportunities. I should be tired of handshakes by now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Mark, others will nab this structure for sure.<br />
There is room for improvement, too: though access to the site&#8217;s MyBarak functionality required me to register, I&#8217;ve yet to receive a(n expected) &#8220;welcome and thank you&#8221; form email from the man himself. Likewise, though I&#8217;ve signed up for a few local groups, I&#8217;ve not gotten a &#8220;thanks for joining &#8212; how would you like to help?&#8221; email from the group leader (this could feasibly be personalized, I reckon, considering most groups appear under 30 folks).<br />
The community-building machine should leap upon these opportunities. I should be tired of handshakes by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark sutherland</title>
		<link>http://high.bigwidesky.com/2007/02/obama-been-bloggin/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>mark sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://high.bigwidesky.com/?p=72#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Definitely a web savvy set-up - combining online connectivity, community, ease-of-use and ownership. Look for other campaigns to try and steal this concept - as well they should.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a web savvy set-up &#8211; combining online connectivity, community, ease-of-use and ownership. Look for other campaigns to try and steal this concept &#8211; as well they should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

